header-logo header-logo

Pay reporting: under pressure

02 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Employment , Diversity
printer mail-detail
26572
Calls for action on ethnicity pay reporting continue to grow, says Charles Pigott
  • Since the publication of a consultation in October 2018, no concrete steps have been taken to progress mandatory ethnicity pay reporting.
  • Recent events will have increased the pressure on the government to act.

Introducing mandatory ethnicity pay reporting was one of the recommendations of the McGregor-Smith review, which reported in 2017 ((https://bit.ly/3jgxPK7). The government’s initial reaction was to encourage such reporting on a voluntary basis. However, following a further review in 2018 ( https://bit.ly/3hyebc3), which revealed that little progress had been made on this and other recommendations over the previous year, the government appears to have been persuaded to move to mandatory reporting.

In October 2018 it published a consultation paper which explored a number of options for introducing the necessary legislation ( https://bit.ly/2YAbQpR). The consultation closed in January 2019. A response has not yet been published.

Recent developments

The latest statement of the government’s position is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Russell-Cooke—Susanna Heley

Legal director appointment bolsters public and regulatory team

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Slater Heelis—five appointments

Firm appoints training partner and four new trainees

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Bolt Burdon Kemp—Natasha Orr

Firm strengthens military claims team with senior associate hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll