header-logo header-logo

02 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Employment , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Pay reporting: under pressure

26572
Calls for action on ethnicity pay reporting continue to grow, says Charles Pigott
  • Since the publication of a consultation in October 2018, no concrete steps have been taken to progress mandatory ethnicity pay reporting.
  • Recent events will have increased the pressure on the government to act.

Introducing mandatory ethnicity pay reporting was one of the recommendations of the McGregor-Smith review, which reported in 2017 ((https://bit.ly/3jgxPK7). The government’s initial reaction was to encourage such reporting on a voluntary basis. However, following a further review in 2018 ( https://bit.ly/3hyebc3), which revealed that little progress had been made on this and other recommendations over the previous year, the government appears to have been persuaded to move to mandatory reporting.

In October 2018 it published a consultation paper which explored a number of options for introducing the necessary legislation ( https://bit.ly/2YAbQpR). The consultation closed in January 2019. A response has not yet been published.

Recent developments

The latest statement of the government’s position is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll