header-logo header-logo

Pay reporting: under pressure

02 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7900 / Categories: Features , Employment , Diversity
printer mail-detail
26572
Calls for action on ethnicity pay reporting continue to grow, says Charles Pigott
  • Since the publication of a consultation in October 2018, no concrete steps have been taken to progress mandatory ethnicity pay reporting.
  • Recent events will have increased the pressure on the government to act.

Introducing mandatory ethnicity pay reporting was one of the recommendations of the McGregor-Smith review, which reported in 2017 ((https://bit.ly/3jgxPK7). The government’s initial reaction was to encourage such reporting on a voluntary basis. However, following a further review in 2018 ( https://bit.ly/3hyebc3), which revealed that little progress had been made on this and other recommendations over the previous year, the government appears to have been persuaded to move to mandatory reporting.

In October 2018 it published a consultation paper which explored a number of options for introducing the necessary legislation ( https://bit.ly/2YAbQpR). The consultation closed in January 2019. A response has not yet been published.

Recent developments

The latest statement of the government’s position is set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll