header-logo header-logo

Peers review dispute resolution & enforcement post-Brexit

03 May 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

A Lords’ committee led by Helena Kennedy QC has issued a stark warning on the consequences of leaving the EU without effective replacement dispute resolution systems in place.

In a report published this week, 'Dispute resolution and enforcement after Brexit', it warns that disagreements with the EU could be ‘potentially insoluble’ and individuals and businesses left without any ability to protect and enforce their rights. Moreover, without the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the government will have to agree multiple dispute resolution procedures.

Chair of the EU Justice Sub-Committee, Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws, said: ‘We are really worried now about the lack of time.

‘This is difficult stuff, and unless both sides show real flexibility in the coming months, not only could the rights of businesses and individuals be threatened, but the whole Brexit withdrawal agreement could end up being potentially unenforceable.’

When the UK leaves, the government has said it will end the direct jurisdiction of the CJEU. The committee oppose leaving the CJEU to interpret ‘the entirety’ of obligations under the withdrawal agreement. This would be ‘problematic’, it says, due to the ‘perception of bias’. However, the CJEU has the final say on interpretation of EU law, which reduces the scope for innovative solutions.

Baroness Kennedy said: ‘The government claimed that continuing the jurisdiction of the [European] Court of Justice was a “red line”.

‘But it is increasingly clear that operating without cross border courts is impossible if we want to trade, have secure borders, cooperate on crime and enforce agreements with the EU as a future partner. It now seems we will have to have a whole set of courts and quasi-courts rather than just one.

‘In fact, even the government now accepts that there may have to be some give and take: if the UK wants to stay in key EU agencies, such as on medicines or aviation, it will have to “respect the remit” of the CJEU.’

As well as covering issues relating to Northern Ireland, mutual recognition of judgments, the transition agreement, the withdrawal agreement and the European Arrest Warrant, the wide-ranging report delves into the impact of Brexit on the influence of the UK legal system. It concludes that the loss of the ability to affect the development of EU case law will have a negative impact on the international standing of the English common law system.

The Law Society is also opposed to the CJEU having sole direct jurisdiction over the deal struck between the EU and UK. It published a paper this week, ‘Brexit: Options for a future UK-EU Dispute Settlement Mechanism’, urging the government to create a bespoke, UK-based mechanism for individuals and organisations to resolve disputes relating to the deal.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll