header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Kim Beatson
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Playing it fair

istock_000008511772medium_4

Kim Beatson examines the role of equitable accounting in family property disputes

The equitable accounting exercise enables the co-owner who has provided money towards a property to reclaim sums that have been spent post-separation. It has to take place in most Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) cases and will usually form part of the substantive claim. Usually, one of the co-owners will continue to live in the jointly held property after the date of separation and will therefore be responsible for paying the mortgage instalments, rates and other outgoings.

The process of equitable accounting has its basis in 18th century chancery proceedings, many of which involved married co-owners (see Leigh v Dickenson (1884) 15 QBD 60). This Court of Equity case established that the proportions in which the entirety of the proceeds of sale should be divided between former co-owners must have regard to any increase in the value of the property brought about as a result of such expenditure.

In Hill v Hickin [1897] 2 CH

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll