header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Playing for keeps

Michael Tringham reports on families—& royalties

The same-sex partner of a flamboyant television presenter and hotelier who committed suicide in 2006 has failed to oust the latter’s executors. When he took his own life, Timothy Hadcock-May’s commercial property business was at the point of financial collapse. Since then his executors have been paying the estate’s debts by allowing the properties to be repossessed or sold off.

Now the Court of Appeal has refused Torquil Mackenzie-Buist leave to pursue further his application to remove the executors, suggesting that he settle with them before spending even more on legal costs. Sir Robin Jacob said: “The question should not come before this court, because it has no prospect of success”, adding it was “as plain as a pikestaff” that the Court of Appeal had no power to oust the executors.

Mackenzie-Buist claimed the executors had no right to dispose of the property portfolio because, having contributed most of the money, he held the properties as a joint tenant in equity—although they were registered in Hadcock-May’s name. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll