header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Playing for keeps

Michael Tringham reports on families—& royalties

The same-sex partner of a flamboyant television presenter and hotelier who committed suicide in 2006 has failed to oust the latter’s executors. When he took his own life, Timothy Hadcock-May’s commercial property business was at the point of financial collapse. Since then his executors have been paying the estate’s debts by allowing the properties to be repossessed or sold off.

Now the Court of Appeal has refused Torquil Mackenzie-Buist leave to pursue further his application to remove the executors, suggesting that he settle with them before spending even more on legal costs. Sir Robin Jacob said: “The question should not come before this court, because it has no prospect of success”, adding it was “as plain as a pikestaff” that the Court of Appeal had no power to oust the executors.

Mackenzie-Buist claimed the executors had no right to dispose of the property portfolio because, having contributed most of the money, he held the properties as a joint tenant in equity—although they were registered in Hadcock-May’s name. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll