header-logo header-logo

10 November 2011 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Playing for keeps

Michael Tringham reports on families—& royalties

The same-sex partner of a flamboyant television presenter and hotelier who committed suicide in 2006 has failed to oust the latter’s executors. When he took his own life, Timothy Hadcock-May’s commercial property business was at the point of financial collapse. Since then his executors have been paying the estate’s debts by allowing the properties to be repossessed or sold off.

Now the Court of Appeal has refused Torquil Mackenzie-Buist leave to pursue further his application to remove the executors, suggesting that he settle with them before spending even more on legal costs. Sir Robin Jacob said: “The question should not come before this court, because it has no prospect of success”, adding it was “as plain as a pikestaff” that the Court of Appeal had no power to oust the executors.

Mackenzie-Buist claimed the executors had no right to dispose of the property portfolio because, having contributed most of the money, he held the properties as a joint tenant in equity—although they were registered in Hadcock-May’s name. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll