header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Kate Edwards
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The power to Improve

Kate Edwards discusses how employee rights can be enhanced after a TUPE transfer

Regent Security Services Limited v Power [2007] EWCA Civ 118, [2007] All ER (D) 298 (Nov) concerned the interpretation of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE), but has wide implications for how the rights and obligations of employees and employers upon a TUPE transfer taking place are to be construed. In particular, the decision makes clear that upon transfer an employee not only retains pre-transfer rights, but may acquire additional rights by agreement with the transferee employer. Where such additional rights are acquired, eg by consensual contractual variation, the employee thereafter has a choice of whether to rely upon the old pre-transfer contract, or new (varied) version. The decision thus represents a pro-employee stance in which the EC Acquired Rights Directive 1977/1877 (the Directive) is construed so as to give maximum choice and maximum benefit to employees who transfer under the TUPE Regulations. The transferee employer, however, may be left with an unpredictable burden.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll