header-logo header-logo

01 May 2008 / Kate Edwards
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The power to Improve

Kate Edwards discusses how employee rights can be enhanced after a TUPE transfer

Regent Security Services Limited v Power [2007] EWCA Civ 118, [2007] All ER (D) 298 (Nov) concerned the interpretation of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 (TUPE), but has wide implications for how the rights and obligations of employees and employers upon a TUPE transfer taking place are to be construed. In particular, the decision makes clear that upon transfer an employee not only retains pre-transfer rights, but may acquire additional rights by agreement with the transferee employer. Where such additional rights are acquired, eg by consensual contractual variation, the employee thereafter has a choice of whether to rely upon the old pre-transfer contract, or new (varied) version. The decision thus represents a pro-employee stance in which the EC Acquired Rights Directive 1977/1877 (the Directive) is construed so as to give maximum choice and maximum benefit to employees who transfer under the TUPE Regulations. The transferee employer, however, may be left with an unpredictable burden.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll