header-logo header-logo

Professional experts

24 January 2008 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

The days of the amateur expert witness are over, says Mark Solon

Over 450 experts attended the annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Conference in November 2007. There was a wide range of experts in the audience who came to hear the attorney general, Baroness Scotland.

 

A snapshot survey conducted on the day produced some interesting results. Income from expert witness work has increased significantly over the past three years. Averages were: 2004: £95,055; 2005: £103,030; and 2006: £120,538. These figures show many experts derive a substantial secondary source of income from expert work.

 

Forty-five per cent of experts said the number of instructions has gone up and 67% said they felt optimistic or very optimistic about their expert witness work in the future. Ninety-nine per cent said experts need training in expert witness skills, perhaps a reflection on the experience of Sir Roy Meadow and others. It seems the days of the amateur expert are over. Although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Fox & Partners—Nikki Edwards

Employment boutique strengthens litigation bench with partner hire

Fladgate—Milan Kapadia

Fladgate—Milan Kapadia

Partner appointed to dispute resolution team

Carey Olsen—Louise Stothard

Carey Olsen—Louise Stothard

Employment law offering in Guernsey expands with new hire

NEWS
Law students and graduates can now apply to qualify as solicitors and barristers with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
back-to-top-scroll