header-logo header-logo

21 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Whistleblowing
printer mail-detail

Protecting whistleblowers as employers ignore concerns

Calls to a legal helpline for whistleblowers are on the rise, with demand highest in the health and social work sectors

The legal charity Protect worked on 3,336 cases in 2024, up 10% on the previous year. All callers to Protect's legal advice line are connected with a legally qualified or legally experienced adviser, supervised by a qualified solicitor, who helps them think how best to raise their concern and guide them through the law. As well as telephone and email support, the charity provides online templates to support legal claims.

Overall, 41% of calls came from the public sector, 26% from the private sector and 21% from the charity sector.  

Just under a third (30%) of callers worked in health and social work, 13% in education and 7% in financial services.

Worryingly, at the time of their call to the helpline, more than two thirds (68%) said they faced victimisation or felt forced to resign. 40% had their concern ignored by their employer, and only one fifth (21%) said their employer was investigating their concern.

Moreover, the majority of calls came from people earning lower incomes although 6% earned £70,000-£90,000 and 7% earned more than £90,000.

Elizabeth Gardiner, chief executive, Protect, said: ‘More than half (51%) of callers to our whistleblowing Advice Line earn less than £30,000.

‘These are often workers in the charity or health and social work sectors raising safeguarding issues or concerns about patient safety.

‘Whistleblowers provide a gift of information to their employers. They are the eyes and ears on the frontline calling things out, identifying safety concerns, protecting the reputation and the bottom line. But whistleblowing is not easy. People who come forward—as witnesses or as victims—should be actively listened to. They need to be confident that action will be taken and they won’t be ignored.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll