header-logo header-logo

21 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Whistleblowing
printer mail-detail

Protecting whistleblowers as employers ignore concerns

Calls to a legal helpline for whistleblowers are on the rise, with demand highest in the health and social work sectors

The legal charity Protect worked on 3,336 cases in 2024, up 10% on the previous year. All callers to Protect's legal advice line are connected with a legally qualified or legally experienced adviser, supervised by a qualified solicitor, who helps them think how best to raise their concern and guide them through the law. As well as telephone and email support, the charity provides online templates to support legal claims.

Overall, 41% of calls came from the public sector, 26% from the private sector and 21% from the charity sector.  

Just under a third (30%) of callers worked in health and social work, 13% in education and 7% in financial services.

Worryingly, at the time of their call to the helpline, more than two thirds (68%) said they faced victimisation or felt forced to resign. 40% had their concern ignored by their employer, and only one fifth (21%) said their employer was investigating their concern.

Moreover, the majority of calls came from people earning lower incomes although 6% earned £70,000-£90,000 and 7% earned more than £90,000.

Elizabeth Gardiner, chief executive, Protect, said: ‘More than half (51%) of callers to our whistleblowing Advice Line earn less than £30,000.

‘These are often workers in the charity or health and social work sectors raising safeguarding issues or concerns about patient safety.

‘Whistleblowers provide a gift of information to their employers. They are the eyes and ears on the frontline calling things out, identifying safety concerns, protecting the reputation and the bottom line. But whistleblowing is not easy. People who come forward—as witnesses or as victims—should be actively listened to. They need to be confident that action will be taken and they won’t be ignored.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll