header-logo header-logo

Protecting whistleblowers as employers ignore concerns

21 March 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Charities , Whistleblowing
printer mail-detail
Calls to a legal helpline for whistleblowers are on the rise, with demand highest in the health and social work sectors

The legal charity Protect worked on 3,336 cases in 2024, up 10% on the previous year. All callers to Protect's legal advice line are connected with a legally qualified or legally experienced adviser, supervised by a qualified solicitor, who helps them think how best to raise their concern and guide them through the law. As well as telephone and email support, the charity provides online templates to support legal claims.

Overall, 41% of calls came from the public sector, 26% from the private sector and 21% from the charity sector.  

Just under a third (30%) of callers worked in health and social work, 13% in education and 7% in financial services.

Worryingly, at the time of their call to the helpline, more than two thirds (68%) said they faced victimisation or felt forced to resign. 40% had their concern ignored by their employer, and only one fifth (21%) said their employer was investigating their concern.

Moreover, the majority of calls came from people earning lower incomes although 6% earned £70,000-£90,000 and 7% earned more than £90,000.

Elizabeth Gardiner, chief executive, Protect, said: ‘More than half (51%) of callers to our whistleblowing Advice Line earn less than £30,000.

‘These are often workers in the charity or health and social work sectors raising safeguarding issues or concerns about patient safety.

‘Whistleblowers provide a gift of information to their employers. They are the eyes and ears on the frontline calling things out, identifying safety concerns, protecting the reputation and the bottom line. But whistleblowing is not easy. People who come forward—as witnesses or as victims—should be actively listened to. They need to be confident that action will be taken and they won’t be ignored.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll