header-logo header-logo

Record claim on husband's estate

24 January 2020
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
The High Court has upheld a widow’s right to bring a claim against her husband’s estate more than 26 years after grant of probate

The High Court has upheld a widow’s right to bring a claim against her husband’s estate more than 26 years after grant of probate

The judgment, handed down this week, Thakare v Bhusate [2020] EWHC 52 (Ch), sets a new landmark in the length of time Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 claims can be brought after death. The previous record of six years was set in Stock v Brown [1994] 1 FLR 840. Normally, claims for reasonable financial provision must be brought within six months of the grant of probate.

Mr and Mrs Bhusate married in India in 1979 when he was 61, twice previously married with five children, and she was 28 and spoke little English. They lived in London and had one child before he died intestate in 1990. The matrimonial home failed to sell, and Mrs Bhusate continues to live there with her son.

Chief Master Marsh granted Mrs Bhusate permission to bring a claim out of time (nearly 25 years after grant of probate), partly on the basis her acrimonious relationship with her stepchildren had obstructed the sale of the house.

The stepchildren appealed, arguing reasonable financial provision had already been made for Mrs Bhusate at the time of Mr Bhusate’s death, and it was her own ‘fault’ that she lost this entitlement. Dismissing the appeal, however, Mr Edwin Johnson QC concluded it was inappropriate to interfere with the Chief Master’s decision. Moreover, he said the ‘administration of the estate was left in limbo’ due to the stepchildren’s lack of co-operation.

Paul Hewitt, partner at Withers, who acted for Mrs Bhusate, said: ‘Despite the eye-catching amount of time which has elapsed since her husband's death, the facts in Mrs Bhusate's case are very specific.’

Issue: 7871 / Categories: Legal News , Wills & Probate
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll