header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Rent reviews: ups & downs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
05 September 2025 / Thomas Rothwell , Kavish Shah
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Commercial
printer mail-detail
228909
Thomas Rothwell & Kavish Shah report on the surprising introduction of downward rent reviews
  • Legislation has been introduced to Parliament to ban upwards-only rent reviews in commercial leases.
  • Part of the proposals will also permit tenants to trigger rent reviews, even where the wording of their lease does not allow them to do so.
  • The government is aiming to deal with what it sees as a power imbalance and to bring down high street rents. However, without recent consultation, it is not clear whether there is enough evidence behind the proposals.
  • It will be interesting to see if parties adapt rent review clauses away from variable factors (like open market rent) and towards stepped rents.

The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, introduced to Parliament on 10 July 2025, contained a surprise: a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in commercial leases. There has not been any consultation with industry about this change.

Commonly, rent review clauses in commercial leases contain upwards-only rent reviews, meaning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Form N510—not just a box to tick
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
NLJ this week: When high rates fall flat
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
NLJ this week: Building digital bridges to justice
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Delegation or dereliction?
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
NLJ this week: FCA faces its toughest test yet
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll