header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 September 2025 / Thomas Rothwell , Kavish Shah
Issue: 8129 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Rent reviews: ups & downs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
228909
Thomas Rothwell & Kavish Shah report on the surprising introduction of downward rent reviews
  • Legislation has been introduced to Parliament to ban upwards-only rent reviews in commercial leases.
  • Part of the proposals will also permit tenants to trigger rent reviews, even where the wording of their lease does not allow them to do so.
  • The government is aiming to deal with what it sees as a power imbalance and to bring down high street rents. However, without recent consultation, it is not clear whether there is enough evidence behind the proposals.
  • It will be interesting to see if parties adapt rent review clauses away from variable factors (like open market rent) and towards stepped rents.

The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, introduced to Parliament on 10 July 2025, contained a surprise: a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in commercial leases. There has not been any consultation with industry about this change.

Commonly, rent review clauses in commercial leases contain upwards-only rent reviews, meaning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
NLJ this week: Court of Appeals wrestles with Mazur fallout
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll