header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Resolving intractable disputes: best practice

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
27 November 2019
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail
Enforcing contractual clauses to mediate, not litigate. Rob Langley, a mediator at North East Mediation Solutions, reports on how new rules are developing
  • The court has a discretion to stay proceedings commenced in breach of an enforceable dispute resolution agreement.

Although not all business-people—or their lawyers—are convinced of the benefits of avoiding the courts, most are; and many commercial agreements now include clauses requiring structured negotiation and then mediation as a precursor to involving the courts.

In Ohpen Operations UK Ltd v Invesco Fund Managers Ltd [2019] EWHC 2246 (TCC), [2019] All ER (D) 86 (Aug)the court considered a typical structured dispute resolution clause. Ohpen was software designer which had a claim for £4.7m against its customer, Invesco, which in turn alleged claims against Ohpen for £5.7m. After failed negotiations, Ohpen lost patience with the resolution procedure, and commenced proceedings. Invesco sought an order to stay proceedings and enforce the mediation clause.

The parties had agreed that any awkward dispute should be: (i) referred to the respective contract managers to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
Read All
Long wait ahead for improvement in parental leave
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
NLJ this week: Gaslighting & post-separation assets
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
NLJ this week: Civil tweaks & courtroom quirks
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
NLJ this week: Righting Libor wrongs
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
NLJ this week: Tackling CPS non-disclosure
Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Brett and Vicky Lankester of Brett Wilson dissect the chronic failures of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in meeting disclosure obligations. From the Post Office scandal to the collapsed trial of Liam Allan, they highlight how systemic neglect has led to wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll