header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
25 January 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Rich pickings

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ian Smith reviews a recent key employment law decision

Employment law is all about protecting the helpless and disadvantaged—right? Well, to adapt Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop, “Up to a point, Lord Copper”. How about this for a festive pre-Christmas headline: “Banker, offered £7m on leaving employment, awarded £12m instead by our top court plus the right to sue for more, including damages for not being able to avoid as much tax on it as he was hoping to”? A real heart-cockles-warmer guaranteed to leave a nice glow in any reader. In a nutshell, that was the decision in Societe Generale, London Branch v Geys [2012] UKSC 63, [2012] All ER (D) 196 (Dec) handed down on 19 December. However, as is so often the case in employment law, what matters here in the longer term will be not the facts but the serious issues raised by them. Make no mistake, this is a genuinely important case on common law principles, even if there may be doubts (discussed below) as to how widespread its practical effects

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll