header-logo header-logo

For richer for poorer?

11 September 2009 / Jane Foulser McFarlane
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

To what extent are intellectual property rights matrimonial assets? asks Jane Foulser McFarlane

The Sunday Times (2 August 2009) reported that ex-Genesis guitarist, Steve Hackett and his wife Kim Poor, who divorced last year, after a 32-year marriage, were embarking on litigation in the High Court, to determine whether Ms Poor, an artist and jewellery designer, was entitled to revenue from Mr Hackett’s intellectual property rights, in respect of classic 1970’s Genesis songs, which he wrote, co-wrote and performed.

Mr Hackett, who had been a lead guitarist with Genesis, until he left the band in the mid 1970s to embark on a solo career, formed a company known as Stephen Hackett Limited, with a view to his future intellectual property rights and royalties, being assigned to that company. Ms Poor is alleging that she is a joint owner of the company, and is entitled to a share of his rights and royalties. However, it appears that Mr Hackett had arranged for all royalties to be paid directly to him as opposed to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll