header-logo header-logo

For richer for poorer?

11 September 2009 / Jane Foulser McFarlane
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

To what extent are intellectual property rights matrimonial assets? asks Jane Foulser McFarlane

The Sunday Times (2 August 2009) reported that ex-Genesis guitarist, Steve Hackett and his wife Kim Poor, who divorced last year, after a 32-year marriage, were embarking on litigation in the High Court, to determine whether Ms Poor, an artist and jewellery designer, was entitled to revenue from Mr Hackett’s intellectual property rights, in respect of classic 1970’s Genesis songs, which he wrote, co-wrote and performed.

Mr Hackett, who had been a lead guitarist with Genesis, until he left the band in the mid 1970s to embark on a solo career, formed a company known as Stephen Hackett Limited, with a view to his future intellectual property rights and royalties, being assigned to that company. Ms Poor is alleging that she is a joint owner of the company, and is entitled to a share of his rights and royalties. However, it appears that Mr Hackett had arranged for all royalties to be paid directly to him as opposed to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Fieldfisher Ireland LLP—Dermot McEvoy

Dublin disputes team announces strategic partner appointment

DWF—four appointments

DWF—four appointments

Firm strengthens in-house advocacy with four new pupil appointments

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Shakespeare Martineau—Fergus Spowart & Fin Campbell

Scottish practice expands with new solicitor hire and trainee qualification

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
back-to-top-scroll