header-logo header-logo

11 September 2009 / Jane Foulser McFarlane
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

For richer for poorer?

To what extent are intellectual property rights matrimonial assets? asks Jane Foulser McFarlane

The Sunday Times (2 August 2009) reported that ex-Genesis guitarist, Steve Hackett and his wife Kim Poor, who divorced last year, after a 32-year marriage, were embarking on litigation in the High Court, to determine whether Ms Poor, an artist and jewellery designer, was entitled to revenue from Mr Hackett’s intellectual property rights, in respect of classic 1970’s Genesis songs, which he wrote, co-wrote and performed.

Mr Hackett, who had been a lead guitarist with Genesis, until he left the band in the mid 1970s to embark on a solo career, formed a company known as Stephen Hackett Limited, with a view to his future intellectual property rights and royalties, being assigned to that company. Ms Poor is alleging that she is a joint owner of the company, and is entitled to a share of his rights and royalties. However, it appears that Mr Hackett had arranged for all royalties to be paid directly to him as opposed to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll