header-logo header-logo

Roam to...?

26 March 2010 / Meghann McTague
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Where has Rome II taken us to in personal injury claims? asks Meghann McTague

The first decision on the application of Rome II came before the UK courts at the end of last year and Mr Justice Owen handed down his judgment last month. In Jacobs v Motor Insurers Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB) on 19 December 2007, Mr Clinton Jacobs, a British national who was resident in the UK, was in the car park of a shopping centre in Fuengirola, Spain. He was stood at the rear of his parked vehicle when he was hit by another car and injured.

The other car was being driven by Mr Winfred Bartsch, a German national who was, at the time of the accident, resident in Spain. The vehicle was uninsured.

Had this accident happened in the UK, then the process for recovering damages for personal injury where the tortfeasor was uninsured would have been entirely straightforward; Mr Jacobs would have sought compensation from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) through its obligation under the Uninsured Drivers’ Agreement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll