header-logo header-logo

Scuppering unscrupulous spouses

06 June 2013 / Edward Heaton , Anna Heenan
Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
istock_000007711731medium

What are the implications of a court setting aside a disposal made by a divorcing spouse to a third party? Anna Heenan & Ed Heaton report

It is not uncommon on divorce for people’s thoughts to turn to limiting their spouse’s financial claim. For the unscrupulous, this can go a step further with people “disposing” of assets to try and put them beyond their spouse’s reach. While the courts have a wide discretion under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973) to redistribute assets between the parties on divorce, matters are inevitably more complicated when the assets in question are held by parties outside the marriage.

In the recent case of AC v DC (No 1) [2012] EWHC 2032 (Fam), the court had to consider the extent to which it was appropriate to invoke its power under s 37 of MCA 1973 to order the setting aside of a disposal made by one of the parties to the marriage to a third party in the form of an offshore corporate trustee.

Background

After

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll