header-logo header-logo

17 December 2021
Issue: 7961 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Shift to in-house boosts legal sector confidence

The number of solicitors working in-house has risen ‘significantly’ in the past decade, amid a UK-wide boost in legal services output

UK legal services are doing well, according to financial and professional services body TheCityUK’s 10th annual legal services report, published last week, Legal excellence, internationally renowned: UK legal services 2021. The upward trend includes a boost in corporate counsel. Nearly a quarter (24%) of all solicitors in England and Wales (more than 31,000 people) worked in-house in 2020, up from 16% a decade ago. The trend was mirrored in Scotland, with 32% of solicitors working in-house, compared to 22% in 2010.

The top 100 law firms have also grown headcount, with year-on-year growth of 3% and total employment (including partners) now exceeding 77,000.

More number-crunching shows about 365,000 people were employed in legal services in 2020, two-thirds of them based outside of London―including 14,000 in Manchester, 9,000 each in Birmingham, Bristol and Leeds, and 7,000 each in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Liverpool.

Globally, the UK legal services market, worth £36.8bn in 2019, is second only to the US. This is helped by the fact English common law forms the basis of the legal systems for 27% of the world’s 320 jurisdictions, as well as the UK’s strong reputation for international dispute resolution.

Miles Celic, chief executive officer, TheCityUK, said: ‘The sustained trend towards companies deepening their in-house legal capacity demonstrates how vital legal expertise is to the success of globally competitive businesses.

‘Supported by the continued growth of leading UK-based law firms, which provide unparalleled training and experience to young lawyers, the UK is able to maintain deep pools of legal talent and retain its status as one of the world’s leading centres for legal services and dispute resolution. The sector remains a trump card in the UK’s wider competitive offer as a global hub for financial and related professiona
Issue: 7961 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Trowers & Hamlins—Rahul Sagar

Banking and finance practice bolstered by partner hire

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

mfg Solicitors—Ian Sheppard

Commercial litigation team welcomes senior associate in Birmingham

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll