header-logo header-logo

Signed & sealed?

21 June 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

David Burrows breaks the seal on Kim v Morris

 

Most divorce cases proceed as a simple administrative exercise, performed by court staff and a district judge, in exchange for a court fee of £340 (the same applies to “applicants” for civil partnership orders, to whom this article also applies). The process is entirely statutory; and thus any judicial discretion must be prescribed by statute. A case has to be properly pleaded: under Family Procedure
Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) forms mostly do that job.

Divorce procedure (FPR 2010, Pt 7) is based on extinct county court rules: interrogatories and discovery only went in April 2011. If a cause is defended, precision pleading is still essential. Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (MCA 1973), s 1(3) requires the court to “inquire” into the facts. If the facts (set out in s 1(2)) are proved, the marriage will be found to have irretrievably broken down (s 1(1)) and a decree will follow (s 1(5)). Though MCA 1973 does not say so, the decree is in the first
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll