header-logo header-logo

Solicitors snap up indemnity bargains

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Professional indemnity insurance rates for solicitors dropped this year—but experts have warned that such premium prices are not sustainable.
Sandra Neilson-Moore, European practice leader for law firms’ professional indemnity at Marsh, says the 1 October renewal deadline saw competition-driven reductions in rates for most law firms in England and Wales.
Top 100 firms saw drops of 10% or more, with their gross revenues allowing insurers to hold premiums relatively steady, while granting generous reductions in terms of rate on revenue. For smaller firms the competition was even keener.

Andrew Jackson, managing director in Marsh’s UK professional indemnity practice, says: “The singular renewal date is unique to the solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance market and, as a result, firms can achieve reduced premiums as the market strives to preserve its share in the closing days of the process.”

He adds, however, that these competitive pressures have resulted in significantly lower premiums which, although good news for firms, may not be sustainable in the longer term.

Frank Maher, a solicitor with Legal Risk, suspects these premium levels are not sustainable beyond next year at most.
“There are a lot of property and mortgage fraud related claims, and conveyancing firms seem to have forgotten the Law Society’s green and blue warning cards and the lessons learned from claims in the 90s which threatened to empty out the Solicitors Indemnity Fund.”

Some firms, he says, have been declined cover by leading insurers because of claims issues, forcing them to take specialist advice and place cover with insurers who would not otherwise have been their first choice.
“I believe the issue in a couple of years will not be one of price but whether some firms can even get cover at all,” he adds.

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll