header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Solicitors snap up indemnity bargains

News

Professional indemnity insurance rates for solicitors dropped this year—but experts have warned that such premium prices are not sustainable.
Sandra Neilson-Moore, European practice leader for law firms’ professional indemnity at Marsh, says the 1 October renewal deadline saw competition-driven reductions in rates for most law firms in England and Wales.
Top 100 firms saw drops of 10% or more, with their gross revenues allowing insurers to hold premiums relatively steady, while granting generous reductions in terms of rate on revenue. For smaller firms the competition was even keener.

Andrew Jackson, managing director in Marsh’s UK professional indemnity practice, says: “The singular renewal date is unique to the solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance market and, as a result, firms can achieve reduced premiums as the market strives to preserve its share in the closing days of the process.”

He adds, however, that these competitive pressures have resulted in significantly lower premiums which, although good news for firms, may not be sustainable in the longer term.

Frank Maher, a solicitor with Legal Risk, suspects these premium levels are not sustainable beyond next year at most.
“There are a lot of property and mortgage fraud related claims, and conveyancing firms seem to have forgotten the Law Society’s green and blue warning cards and the lessons learned from claims in the 90s which threatened to empty out the Solicitors Indemnity Fund.”

Some firms, he says, have been declined cover by leading insurers because of claims issues, forcing them to take specialist advice and place cover with insurers who would not otherwise have been their first choice.
“I believe the issue in a couple of years will not be one of price but whether some firms can even get cover at all,” he adds.

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll