header-logo header-logo

Spotlight on directors

23 September 2010 / Rod Lambert , Christopher Reekie
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Company , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Rod Lambert & Christopher Reekie revisit Directors’ Disqualification Orders

Where a company is alleged to have breached competition law rules, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) may bring an action seeking to disqualify directors of that company from acting as a director for a period of up to 15 years, if their actions, either by act or omission, have in some way contributed to the alleged breach. In recently published guidance, the OFT has further explained how it will approach director disqualification proceedings. Companies and directors should pay close attention to this latest clarification of the UK competition regulator’s armoury. Failure to take note could have serious consequences.

Background

On 29 June 2010, the OFT published new guidance, which clarifies the powers of the OFT under the Competition Disqualification Order (CDO) provisions of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, as amended by the Enterprise Act 2002 (CDDA). The Guidance sets out the general approach that the OFT will adopt in seeking CDOs against individual directors, their professional advisors and professional associations. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll