header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Rod Lambert , Christopher Reekie
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Company , Practice areas
printer mail-detail

Spotlight on directors

Rod Lambert & Christopher Reekie revisit Directors’ Disqualification Orders

Where a company is alleged to have breached competition law rules, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) may bring an action seeking to disqualify directors of that company from acting as a director for a period of up to 15 years, if their actions, either by act or omission, have in some way contributed to the alleged breach. In recently published guidance, the OFT has further explained how it will approach director disqualification proceedings. Companies and directors should pay close attention to this latest clarification of the UK competition regulator’s armoury. Failure to take note could have serious consequences.

Background

On 29 June 2010, the OFT published new guidance, which clarifies the powers of the OFT under the Competition Disqualification Order (CDO) provisions of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, as amended by the Enterprise Act 2002 (CDDA). The Guidance sets out the general approach that the OFT will adopt in seeking CDOs against individual directors, their professional advisors and professional associations.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll