header-logo header-logo

Straw to regulate CFAs

21 May 2009
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Costs , Employment
printer mail-detail

Costs

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is clamping down on “contingency fee agreements”, where “no win no fee” lawyers extract a large proportion of their client’s damages for excessive legal fees.

The damages-based arrangements are most common in employment tribunal proceedings and are largely unregulated. The MoJ intends to use the Coroners and Justice Bill, currently before Parliament, to introduce proper regulation to protect against unfair or unreasonable agreements.

The new regulations are likely to include: a cap on the percentage of damages that can be recovered by the legal representative; a requirement that legal representatives provide claimants with clear and transparent information on total costs; a requirement that legal representatives clarify the deductions made from the claimant’s award which are to go to the representative as their fee for taking on the case; and a requirement that they provide explicit information on alternative methods of funding.

The justice secretary, Jack Straw, says: “These arrangements—unlike, for example, conditional fee agreements—have been without statutory regulation because of an anomalous and long standing interpretation of the law which has classified proceedings in employment tribunals as ‘non-contentious’.”

The department is due to publish a consultation paper with more details.

(For more on costs see this issue pp 737–748.)

Issue: 7370 / Categories: Legal News , Damages , Costs , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll