header-logo header-logo

Strictly compliant

Julian Miller and Parminder Badhan emphasise the importance of complying with notification provisions in insurance policies

Under a claims-made insurance policy, the insurer is liable for claims made against the insured by a third party during the policy period. A notification provision, which is a key feature of all claims-made policies, allows the insured to notify its insurer when it becomes aware of circumstances that might later give rise to a claim. Subsequent claims arising from the circumstances notified are then covered by the policy.

The scope and operation of notification provisions in claims-made policies has not always been entirely clear. Two High Court cases, HLB Kidsons (a firm) v Lloyd's Underwriters subscribing to Lloyd's Policy No 621/ PKID00101 [2007] EWHC 1951, [2008] 2 All ER 769, and more recently, Kajima UK Engineering Ltd v Underwriter Insurance Co Ltd [2008] EWHC 83, [2008] All ER (D) 194 (Jan), provide clarification.

The Facts

HLB Kidsons (a firm of accountants) had received claims arising from tax avoidance schemes. It argued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll