header-logo header-logo

Subpostmasters fight on after Horizon compensation letdown

02 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Costs , Compensation
printer mail-detail
More than 500 former subpostmasters caught up in the faulty Post Office Horizon computer scandal are seeking justice after recovering only five per cent of their losses when the Post Office settled the case due to the Jackson reforms

The Justice for Subpostmaster Alliance (JFSA) is bringing a complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman on behalf of its 555 members. The subpostmasters had their contracts terminated. Many lost their businesses and homes, a number were charged with false accounting and theft, and some even received custodial sentences―yet it was all because of mistakes made by the faulty computer system.

The Post Office subsequently paid £57m to settle the case last year. However, the JFSA says just £11.5m actually made it into the hands of the subpostmasters involved due to the costs of bringing the case. The JFSA says this represents, on average, about 5% of their actual losses.

The JFSA has now instructed law firm Stevens Bolton to act on its behalf, and is submitting a complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman alleging maladministration within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). The government was the sole shareholder in the Post Office when the scandal happened.

Sarah Murray, head of dispute resolution at Stevens & Bolton, said: ‘Members of the JFSA have been through so much, as a result of the wrongs suffered at the hands of the Post Office.

‘The failure of the government to intervene has exacerbated their suffering.’

Kay Linnell, forensic accountant and adviser to JFSA, said: ‘This is about recovering the considerable legal costs incurred by members in taking the Post Office to court to expose inherent faults in the Post Office’s Horizon computer system, the incompetence of the Post Office and the failings of the government, who as the only shareholder, failed to manage its subsidiary.

‘The 555 claimants who were brave enough to join this group litigation, having already suffered such personal anguish and financial loss, have borne the additional financial burden of funding this action. They cannot recover their funding costs as a result of the Jackson Reforms of 1 April 2013. 

‘It cannot be right that individual impecunious litigants, who have succeeded in their case, are excluded from the equitable repayment of the financing costs. We are still striving for justice to be done and we need help from the public now.’

The JFSA has set up a CrowdJustice platform to help it fund its legal fight. See: www.crowdjustice.com/case/post-office-victims.

Categories: Legal News , Costs , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll