header-logo header-logo

Surviving the TUPE transfer

17 February 2021 / John McMullen
Issue: 7921 / Categories: Features , Employment , TUPE
printer mail-detail
39785
John McMullen provides an update on TUPE in relation to restrictive covenants
  • TUPE and restrictive covenants: the background.
  • The P14 Medical case: covenants, novation and liability.

In the recent England and Wales High Court case of P14 Medical Ltd v Mahon [2020] EWHC 1823 Mr Justice Cavanagh expressed the view that it is beyond doubt that a restrictive covenant in a transferring employee’s employment contract can transfer under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246 (TUPE). In this case, a TUPE transfer occurred. Mr Mahon was a transferring employee. After the transfer, Mr Mahon resigned from the transferee, P14 Medical, to join a competitor of the business. But Mr Mahon’s transferred employment contract had restrictions which forbade that. Could P14 Medical sue to enforce those restrictions? In principle, yes, said Cavanagh J. As the effect of TUPE is that the contracts of employment of all employees in the part transferred are automatically transferred, by operation of law, from the transferor to the transferee, and the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Anne-Marie Ottaway, HFW

NLJ Career Profile: Anne-Marie Ottaway, HFW

Anne-Marie Ottaway, partner at HFW, discusses her varied career, including 13 years at the Serious Fraud Office, and making the leap to private practice

Carey Olsen—Arindam Madhuryya

Carey Olsen—Arindam Madhuryya

Corporate and investment funds lawyer promoted to partner in Jersey

Jackson Lees—Jennifer Carr

Jackson Lees—Jennifer Carr

Private family team announces appointment of senior associate

NEWS
The government’s landmark Employment Rights Act 2025 met its pre-Christmas deadline, ushering in sweeping changes to the law
Barristers and advocates in Scotland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland have urged the government to drop its proposals for judge-only ‘swift courts’ in cases where the sentence is three years or less
The practice guidance on non-molestation orders has been updated and replaced, and guidance issued on protective injunctions
Criminal silk Kirsty Brimelow KC, of Doughty Street Chambers, has taken over the reins at the Bar Council, succeeding family silk Barbara Mills KC
Lawyers have welcomed the government’s long-awaited announcement of legislation to reverse PACCAR but warned plans for light-touch regulation could cause delays
back-to-top-scroll