header-logo header-logo

Tackling toxic workplaces

21 March 2025 / Thomas Beale
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Features , Harassment , Employment
printer mail-detail
211937
Is the law doing enough to protect employees from bullying & harassment? Thomas Beale examines recent reforms & considers what else is needed
  • Recent changes in the law have forced organisations to step up their anti-harassment policies, but the framework still fails to hold employers sufficiently accountable for bullying and harassment.
  • A legal definition of workplace bullying is urgently needed so that victims can seek protection and restitution in the law.

Recent figures from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s Good Work Index indicate that a quarter of surveyed employees have experienced some form of conflict or abuse within the past 12 months, highlighting that workplace bullying remains a prevalent issue in the UK.

Regrettably, the inappropriate normalisation of uncivil behaviour in the workplace often leads to its dismissal as mere ‘banter’, significantly minimising its severity. The short and long-term psychological consequences for victims are frequently overlooked or trivialised, resulting in individuals feeling unable to come forward for fear of invalidation.

Employers can play a crucial role in combating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll