header-logo header-logo

Tackling toxic workplaces

21 March 2025 / Thomas Beale
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Features , Harassment , Employment
printer mail-detail
211937
Is the law doing enough to protect employees from bullying & harassment? Thomas Beale examines recent reforms & considers what else is needed
  • Recent changes in the law have forced organisations to step up their anti-harassment policies, but the framework still fails to hold employers sufficiently accountable for bullying and harassment.
  • A legal definition of workplace bullying is urgently needed so that victims can seek protection and restitution in the law.

Recent figures from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s Good Work Index indicate that a quarter of surveyed employees have experienced some form of conflict or abuse within the past 12 months, highlighting that workplace bullying remains a prevalent issue in the UK.

Regrettably, the inappropriate normalisation of uncivil behaviour in the workplace often leads to its dismissal as mere ‘banter’, significantly minimising its severity. The short and long-term psychological consequences for victims are frequently overlooked or trivialised, resulting in individuals feeling unable to come forward for fear of invalidation.

Employers can play a crucial role in combating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll