header-logo header-logo

Product liability & the ‘Peter Parker principle’

02 July 2021 / Sarah Moore , Stuart Warmington
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail
52118
Sarah Moore & Stuart Warmington discuss product liability & the platform economy at home & abroad

You don’t have to be a statistician to know that the pandemic has transformed our shopping habits. Perhaps forever. The closure of physical stores during lockdowns in response to COVID-19 forced a nation of voracious consumers (of the necessary and not so necessary) onto online shopping platforms, supercharging our use and their profits.

Yet, the ‘Peter Parker principle’ states that with ‘great power comes great responsibility’. There is little doubt that online platforms now wield even more power over consumers in terms of what, how and when we buy. The more vexing question for regulators, consumer advocates and those adversely affected by products purchased through online platforms, is how to balance this great power with appropriate legal responsibilities.

The issue of ‘platform’ accountability is not entirely new for US lawmakers: a series of cases filed even before the pandemic against Amazon involve a range of products, including flammable hoverboards (Fox v

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll