header-logo header-logo

This week in NLJ: Government accountability on COVID-19 decisions

20 May 2020
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
Former Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption’s ‘obviously wrong’ views on the lockdown, published in The Sunday Timeson last month, demonstrate why proper decision making and accountability are ‘all the more important’ during the COVID-19 pandemic, John Gould, senior partner at Russell-Cooke, writes in this week’s NLJ.

Lord Sumption’s view, two weeks into lockdown, that politicians were overreacting to the coronavirus illustrates, Gould writes, ‘some of the difficulties of making urgent decisions without solid evidence and substituting instead the imperatives of a belief system in which individual freedom is the only preferred child in a precious family.

‘Contrary to the plausible, but incorrect, hypothesis expressed in the article, it may well turn out to be the case that government decision makers acted too slowly, with insufficient vigour and failed to get to grips with the necessary detail.’

As well as critiquing Lord Sumption’s controversial column, Gould highlights the importance of decision making and government accountability during the crisis. He calls for the government to be held to account, and explains why ‘the mantra that nominal decision makers are only following scientific advice should be disturbing to anyone familiar with the requirements of public law’.

Read John Gould’s article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll