header-logo header-logo

Trafficking victims win review

25 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ to undertake review of legal aid provision following threat of judicial review

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is to conduct an urgent review of legal aid provision for trafficking victims seeking to bring compensation claims against the perpetrators, after the High Court granted permission for a judicial review.

Parliament included a clause in the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 to ensure victims could bring compensation claims against their traffickers. The Anti-Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit (ATLEU) argued that the way the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) had implemented the provision meant that victims were not able to access legal advice and assistance to bring claims. Support agencies Kalayaan, Medaille Trust, Migrant Help and Hope for Justice supplied evidence showing that many victims were unable to access advice because of the limited number of providers able to deal with compensation claims, and the limited number of claims each one could handle.

Mr Justice Blake granted permission to pursue the judicial review. However, shortly before the hearing, the MoJ and LAA agreed to undertake a review by the end of June, and to implement any approved recommendations as soon as possible. Following this concession, ATLEU withdrew its claim.

The review will identify whether there are barriers to advice and assistance, the causes of these and what steps should be taken.

Shu Shin Luh, Garden Court Chambers, who acted pro bono for ATLEU, says: “If the government wants to realise its commitment under the Modern Slavery Act to provide victims of trafficking and modern slavery a right to seek reparations from their traffickers, then it must ensure that there is a system in place which gives victims effective and practical access to legal advice and assistance to realise their rights.

“This hasn’t happened to date. It is hoped that with this review the lord chancellor will now adhere to his commitments toward trafficking victims to ensure they are able exercise their right to seek reparations and hold to account those who have exploited them.”

As part of the order comprising the judicial review, the government is to pay £12,000 in costs to the Access to Justice Foundation under the scheme for pro bono costs orders.

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll