header-logo header-logo

21 February 2014 / Philip Thornton
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE changes: a bad move?

web_thornton

Philip Thornton discusses the new wording and uncertainties of TUPE

The majority of the amendments to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/246) (TUPE) came into force on 31 January 2014. This article suggests that, for a variety of reasons, the way in which some of these changes have been implemented may cause considerable uncertainty in the operation of TUPE for some time to come. Although the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) has provided guidance on the operation of TUPE following the amendments, in certain respects that guidance does not appear to resolve these problems.

When a dismissal will be automatically unfair

The most significant change with regard to automatic unfair dismissal protection under the 2014 amendments is that the concept of a “reason connected with the transfer” is entirely expunged from reg 7, ie in determining whether or not a dismissal is automatically unfair, no express distinction is drawn any longer between where the reason for the dismissal is:

  • “the transfer itself”; or
  • a
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Morr & Co—20 promotions

Morr & Co—20 promotions

Firm announces double-digit promotions, including two new partners

Switalskis—Jonathan Hyldon

Switalskis—Jonathan Hyldon

Head of commercial property appointed in Lincolnshire

Excello Law—Caroline Gray & Mick Hewitt

Excello Law—Caroline Gray & Mick Hewitt

Corporate and commercial property partners appointed in Manchester and Stoke

NEWS
Family law chambers 4PB has announced the return of the Alan Inglis Memorial Essay Prize for a third consecutive year, honouring the life and legacy of LGBTQ+ advocate and barrister Alan Inglis

A long-standing issue in family justice can now be resolved, thanks to recently launched charity the Separated Parenting Programme Directory (SPPD)

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has become ‘a very different organisation’ under its new enforcement leadership, writes James Tyler, of counsel at Peters & Peters LLP, in the latest issue of NLJ

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll