header-logo header-logo

25 October 2018 / John McMullen
Issue: 7814 / Categories: Features , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

TUPE & variation of employment contracts

John McMullen discusses the variation of employment contracts after TUPE transfers

  • Two recent cases have involved examination of an employer’s ability to make changes to the employment contract following a TUPE transfer.

In Tabberer and others v Mears Ltd UKEAT/0064/17, [2018] All ER (D) 180 (Feb) the claimant employees were electricians originally employed by Birmingham City Council. Since their employment with BCC they had been TUPE’d a number of times, ultimately to Mears Ltd. With BCC they enjoyed terms entitling them to payment of an Electrician’s TravelTime Allowance (ETTA). This had been introduced as long ago as 1956 (well before the claimants had joined BCC) and were now anachronistic. The original purpose of the ETTA was to compensate electricians for the loss of a productivity bonus caused by the need to travel to different depots. At that time, BCC had 30 to 40 depots across Birmingham, but, over the years, depots had been closed so that, by the time relevant to these claims, only one remained—at Kings Road. Furthermore, since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll