header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under control?

Section 18 of PACE and the interpretation of “occupied or controlled”, by Neil Parpworth

Where a person has been arrested for an indictable (formerly an arrestable) offence, s 18(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), as amended by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, empowers the police to enter and search any premises “occupied or controlled” by the person under arrest where the relevant officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find on the premises evidence relating to the indictable offence for which the person has been arrested, or evidence relating to some other indictable offence which is connected with or similar to that offence. Normally the power of entry and search under s 18 cannot be exercised without the prior written authorisation of an officer of the rank of inspector or above (s 18(4)). However, this is not an absolute restriction on the use of the s 18 power. The written authorisation requirement need not be complied with if the presence of the arrested person is necessary at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DSW Legal—James Mallender

DSW Legal—James Mallender

Business advisory group launches dedicated legal division with senior appointment

Gilson Gray—Peter Millican

Gilson Gray—Peter Millican

London corporate practice with partner appointment

Ward Hadaway—Alex Cooper

Ward Hadaway—Alex Cooper

Corporate team welcomes partner in Leeds

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll