header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Under control?

Section 18 of PACE and the interpretation of “occupied or controlled”, by Neil Parpworth

Where a person has been arrested for an indictable (formerly an arrestable) offence, s 18(1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), as amended by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, empowers the police to enter and search any premises “occupied or controlled” by the person under arrest where the relevant officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find on the premises evidence relating to the indictable offence for which the person has been arrested, or evidence relating to some other indictable offence which is connected with or similar to that offence. Normally the power of entry and search under s 18 cannot be exercised without the prior written authorisation of an officer of the rank of inspector or above (s 18(4)). However, this is not an absolute restriction on the use of the s 18 power. The written authorisation requirement need not be complied with if the presence of the arrested person is necessary at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Rhiannon Griffiths

Muckle LLP—Rhiannon Griffiths

Firm welcomes back returning lawyer to real estate team

Lawrence Stephens—Amanda Nelson

Lawrence Stephens—Amanda Nelson

Partner joins private wealth and succession planning team

Lewis Silkin—JP Buckley

Lewis Silkin—JP Buckley

Manchester team expands with first data partner hire

NEWS
Premier Solicitors and Finders International emerged as leading winners at the 2026 Probate Industry Awards, held in London and now in their eighth year
Client complaints about ‘more modest bills’ of £50,000 or less would be handled by the Legal Ombudsman rather than the courts, under Civil Justice Council (CJC) proposals
Global firm Dentons could be forced to return to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) over its vetting of a client inherited from its merger with French firm Salans, following a Court of Appeal decision
Judges are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools to help them produce anonymised judgments, Sir Colin Birss, Chancellor of the High Court, has said
Solicitors would be required to enter into ‘mandatory ethical discussions’ each year, under Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) proposals
back-to-top-scroll