header-logo header-logo

Unfair dismissals—stormy waters ahead?

20 May 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
81945
Mass dismissal of P&O staff has shed a light on limitations of UK labour law, says Charles Pigott
  • The sudden dismissal of 786 seafarers by P&O in March 2022 has led the Government to announce a new statutory code of practice.
  • Their replacement with cheaper agency workers has also illustrated the territorial limitations of the UK’s National Minimum Wage legislation.

The dismissal of nearly 800 staff by various companies in the P&O group in mid-March without prior consultation or notice, led to widespread calls for more to be done to protect workers in the context of mass redundancies. It also provides an illustration of how the legal regime, which applies to international shipping companies, even if some of their operations are based in the UK, differs significantly from that applying to shore-based businesses.

Collective redundancies legislation

Like most domestic employment protection legislation, the provisions on collective redundancies in Part IV Chapter II of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA) extend to employees who have a sufficiently close connection

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll