header-logo header-logo

Unfair dismissals—stormy waters ahead?

20 May 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7979 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
81945
Mass dismissal of P&O staff has shed a light on limitations of UK labour law, says Charles Pigott
  • The sudden dismissal of 786 seafarers by P&O in March 2022 has led the Government to announce a new statutory code of practice.
  • Their replacement with cheaper agency workers has also illustrated the territorial limitations of the UK’s National Minimum Wage legislation.

The dismissal of nearly 800 staff by various companies in the P&O group in mid-March without prior consultation or notice, led to widespread calls for more to be done to protect workers in the context of mass redundancies. It also provides an illustration of how the legal regime, which applies to international shipping companies, even if some of their operations are based in the UK, differs significantly from that applying to shore-based businesses.

Collective redundancies legislation

Like most domestic employment protection legislation, the provisions on collective redundancies in Part IV Chapter II of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA) extend to employees who have a sufficiently close connection

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll