header-logo header-logo

What might have been…

05 March 2015 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reflects on the Jackson reforms

"Oh what's the bloody point?". The last words recorded in the diary of the sad comedian Kenneth Williams before he swallowed an overdose might well be ruefully uttered now by Sir Rupert Jackson. 

It will be remembered that his brief was to propose reforms that would enable justice to be secured at proportionate cost. An unholy combination of circumstances seem to have thwarted his aims.

Control

Sir Rupert recommended that court fees should be kept under control. These words have been conveniently ignored by the Ministry of Justice. Recent changes will propel some fees up by 622% at one level and others would rise by over 400%. These cretinous changes will either make litigation dramatically more expensive or will deter those with viable claims from ever pursuing them. Either way, a Jackson tenet will be frustrated. It is shameful. 

Fast-track litigation, some injury apart, still lacks a predictable costs regime. Jackson privately pushed to have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll