header-logo header-logo

What might have been…

05 March 2015 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reflects on the Jackson reforms

"Oh what's the bloody point?". The last words recorded in the diary of the sad comedian Kenneth Williams before he swallowed an overdose might well be ruefully uttered now by Sir Rupert Jackson. 

It will be remembered that his brief was to propose reforms that would enable justice to be secured at proportionate cost. An unholy combination of circumstances seem to have thwarted his aims.

Control

Sir Rupert recommended that court fees should be kept under control. These words have been conveniently ignored by the Ministry of Justice. Recent changes will propel some fees up by 622% at one level and others would rise by over 400%. These cretinous changes will either make litigation dramatically more expensive or will deter those with viable claims from ever pursuing them. Either way, a Jackson tenet will be frustrated. It is shameful. 

Fast-track litigation, some injury apart, still lacks a predictable costs regime. Jackson privately pushed to have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll