header-logo header-logo

05 March 2015 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

What might have been…

Dominic Regan reflects on the Jackson reforms

"Oh what's the bloody point?". The last words recorded in the diary of the sad comedian Kenneth Williams before he swallowed an overdose might well be ruefully uttered now by Sir Rupert Jackson. 

It will be remembered that his brief was to propose reforms that would enable justice to be secured at proportionate cost. An unholy combination of circumstances seem to have thwarted his aims.

Control

Sir Rupert recommended that court fees should be kept under control. These words have been conveniently ignored by the Ministry of Justice. Recent changes will propel some fees up by 622% at one level and others would rise by over 400%. These cretinous changes will either make litigation dramatically more expensive or will deter those with viable claims from ever pursuing them. Either way, a Jackson tenet will be frustrated. It is shameful. 

Fast-track litigation, some injury apart, still lacks a predictable costs regime. Jackson privately pushed to have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll