header-logo header-logo

18 October 2018 / David Fisher
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

When a good lawyer jumps ship (Pt 2)

For optimum protection, firms need to ensure that restrictive covenants contain the right contractual terms & that the proper steps are taken to enforce them, as David Fisher explains

  • Whatever type of restrictive covenants partners are subject to, it is important that firms keep the restrictions under review and update them to account for changes in their business and developments in the law.

Some partnerships and LLPs choose not to impose post-termination restrictive covenants on their partners or members. This might be for cultural reasons, or (especially in small or new firms) because no partner or member wants to be prevented from competing with the firm or acting for their clients for a period of time if they happen to be the one who decides to leave. However, the majority of firms want the protection that good restrictive covenants can give to their business, and this means having the right contractual terms in the first place and taking proper steps to enforce them. Part one of this series covered the general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll