header-logo header-logo

18 October 2018 / David Fisher
Issue: 7813 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

When a good lawyer jumps ship (Pt 2)

For optimum protection, firms need to ensure that restrictive covenants contain the right contractual terms & that the proper steps are taken to enforce them, as David Fisher explains

  • Whatever type of restrictive covenants partners are subject to, it is important that firms keep the restrictions under review and update them to account for changes in their business and developments in the law.

Some partnerships and LLPs choose not to impose post-termination restrictive covenants on their partners or members. This might be for cultural reasons, or (especially in small or new firms) because no partner or member wants to be prevented from competing with the firm or acting for their clients for a period of time if they happen to be the one who decides to leave. However, the majority of firms want the protection that good restrictive covenants can give to their business, and this means having the right contractual terms in the first place and taking proper steps to enforce them. Part one of this series covered the general

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll