header-logo header-logo

30 January 2015 / Patricia Leighton
Issue: 7638 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Where next?

leighton

Why LERNing matters. Patricia Leighton explains why it pays to invest in research into legal education

The legal media, profession and educators have been debating the implications of the Legal Education and Training Review(LETR)—a research-based report funded by the main regulators of professional legal education in England and Wales—since work first commenced on it in 2011.

The LETR was a major report on the nature and content of legal education and the first for over 40 years. Since then, the number of law schools, law courses and students has grown dramatically. Unsurprisingly, one of the LETR’s main recommendations was that there should be more research into legal education itself.

We have recently seen major problems for law graduates, including a hugely competitive market for training contracts and pupillage, “forcing” many graduates into non-law careers. We have also become aware of eye-watering levels of student debt and of complaints and criticism of legal education itself. While it is correct that, generally, law programmes rate quite well in the National Student Surveys it appears that at least

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll