header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 September 2024 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Where Next for equal pay?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
189732
The ruling in the group action against the retailer paves the way for more claimants in the retail sector & beyond, writes Charles Pigott
  • Last month’s employment tribunal decision in the Next equal pay litigation is the first substantive ruling to emerge from six separate group actions being brought against national retailers, including Asda and Tesco.

After years of interlocutory hearings, it had been established that the work done by predominantly female store workers was of equal value to that done by their comparators, who worked in Next’s warehouses where a majority of the workers are male. The final stage was reached earlier this year, when a 15-day hearing took place to hear Next’s material factor defence in relation to 17 groups of terms. The reserved decision has now been published (Thandi and others v Next Retail Ltd and Next Distribution Ltd Leeds ET 1302019/18 and others). There are now over 3,500 claimants in this group action.

Next has indicated that it intends to appeal.

The material factor defence

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll