header-logo header-logo

Where Next for equal pay?

20 September 2024 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 8086 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
189732
The ruling in the group action against the retailer paves the way for more claimants in the retail sector & beyond, writes Charles Pigott
  • Last month’s employment tribunal decision in the Next equal pay litigation is the first substantive ruling to emerge from six separate group actions being brought against national retailers, including Asda and Tesco.

After years of interlocutory hearings, it had been established that the work done by predominantly female store workers was of equal value to that done by their comparators, who worked in Next’s warehouses where a majority of the workers are male. The final stage was reached earlier this year, when a 15-day hearing took place to hear Next’s material factor defence in relation to 17 groups of terms. The reserved decision has now been published (Thandi and others v Next Retail Ltd and Next Distribution Ltd Leeds ET 1302019/18 and others). There are now over 3,500 claimants in this group action.

Next has indicated that it intends to appeal.

The material factor defence

It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll