header-logo header-logo

Whose decision is it anyway?

27 November 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7678 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7678_pigott

Less emphasis should be placed on the state of mind of an individual decision maker in cases of unfair dismissal, says Charles Pigott

It has always been regarded as a key ingredient of procedural fairness that the decision to dismiss must be that of the dismissing officer, not least because the employee should be given the opportunity to influence the final decision at the disciplinary hearing. It is also accepted that managers making disciplinary decisions frequently need to take advice, whether from their internal human resources (HR) department or from external experts. But at what point does legitimate advice stray into unjustified interference with the decision-making process?

This issue is not addressed directly in the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. The more extensive ACAS Guide on Discipline and Grievances at Work includes only two mentions. It recommends that if guidance is needed advice should be sought from someone who will not be involved in any potential appeal or from the ACAS helpline. Later on it has a small section

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll