header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024 / Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Workplace protection for trans people

154935
Gender reassignment is a protected characteristic, but it’s not that simple, writes Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
  • The Equality Act 2010, s 7 encompasses non-binary and gender-fluid identities.
  • Identifying as trans-gender is not sufficient to acquire the protected characteristic of gender reassignment. Something more is required.
  • There are two competing approaches to identifying the correct comparator in section 7 cases.

Section 7 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA) protects against discrimination on the basis of gender reassignment. But who exactly does this protect and in what circumstances? What is the relationship between gender reassignment and sex? And who is the correct comparator for a person bringing a claim of discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment?

The scope of section 7

The protected characteristic (PC) of gender reassignment is defined by the Equality Act 2010 as follows: ‘A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll