header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024 / Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Workplace protection for trans people

154935
Gender reassignment is a protected characteristic, but it’s not that simple, writes Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
  • The Equality Act 2010, s 7 encompasses non-binary and gender-fluid identities.
  • Identifying as trans-gender is not sufficient to acquire the protected characteristic of gender reassignment. Something more is required.
  • There are two competing approaches to identifying the correct comparator in section 7 cases.

Section 7 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA) protects against discrimination on the basis of gender reassignment. But who exactly does this protect and in what circumstances? What is the relationship between gender reassignment and sex? And who is the correct comparator for a person bringing a claim of discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment?

The scope of section 7

The protected characteristic (PC) of gender reassignment is defined by the Equality Act 2010 as follows: ‘A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll