header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024 / Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Workplace protection for trans people

154935
Gender reassignment is a protected characteristic, but it’s not that simple, writes Sapandeep Singh Maini-Thompson
  • The Equality Act 2010, s 7 encompasses non-binary and gender-fluid identities.
  • Identifying as trans-gender is not sufficient to acquire the protected characteristic of gender reassignment. Something more is required.
  • There are two competing approaches to identifying the correct comparator in section 7 cases.

Section 7 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA) protects against discrimination on the basis of gender reassignment. But who exactly does this protect and in what circumstances? What is the relationship between gender reassignment and sex? And who is the correct comparator for a person bringing a claim of discrimination on grounds of gender reassignment?

The scope of section 7

The protected characteristic (PC) of gender reassignment is defined by the Equality Act 2010 as follows: ‘A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if the person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll