header-logo header-logo

The year ahead in litigation

25 January 2018 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
nlj_7778_regan

Dominic Regan sees changes ahead for disclosure, fixed costs, costs appeals & a likely hike in the entry threshold for the High Court

Do not be deceived by the gentle start to 2018. It is going to be a bumper year for civil litigation.

We have already witnessed one disruptive development with the successful May v Wavell appeal on proportionality (see ‘All clear as May v Wavell costs overturned?’). The claimant has seen his recoverable costs double. This decision just accentuates the utter uncertainty which continues to swirl around a key 2013 reform. Expect more appeal decisions, and hope for something approaching clear guidance to emerge, eventually, from the Court of Appeal. It is long overdue.

The father of modern proportionality, Sir Rupert Jackson, retires on 7 March, his 70th birthday. As reported in this journal, we will also lose three members of the Supreme Court bench this year (see Professor Brice Dickson's ‘In the line of duty’, NLJ 12 January 2018). Lords Mance, Hughes and Sumption will depart.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll