header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7554

28 March 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Peter Thompson QC assesses the impact of Jackson on the reasonable person

Many solicitors are anticipating the legal aid cuts with an increasing sense of doom, says Cara Nuttall

Jo Renshaw outlines the effect LASPO 2012 will have on those doing publicly funded work

Marc Weller tracks the origins & the compliance issues associated with the prohibition of the use of force in international relations

How do courts deal with the question of costs where an arbitration award is being challenged? James Harrison reports

Andy Glenie & Georgia Dunphy explain how to go about enforcing your judgment in New Zealand

Jacksonchat, tribunal rules & child's play

Martin Burns highlights the benefits of appointing a commercial mediator

Apex Global Management Ltd v Fi Call Ltd and others [2013] EWHC 587 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 202 (Mar)

Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 17, [2013] All ER (D) 190 (Mar)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll