Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7623

The judge’s discretion on a 1954 Act tenancy renewal still carries a great deal of weight, says Steven Woolf

Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31, [2014] All ER (D) 40 (Aug)

Harassment in Court & Ouch! 

GMAC UK plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-589/12, [2014] All ER (D) 28 (Sep)

Biscuits Poult SAS v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-494/12, [2014] All ER (D) 65 (Sep)

R (on the application of An Taisce (The National Trust for Ireland)) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2014] EWCA Civ 1111, [2014] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

R (on the application of Hamill) v Chelmsford Magistrates’ Court [2014] EWHC 2799 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 59 (Aug)

Alternative Power Solution Ltd v Central Electricity Board and another [2014] UKPC 31, [2014] All ER (D) 55 (Sep)

R (on the application of HS2 Action Alliance Ltd and another) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] EWHC 2759 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

Professor Michael Zander QC reflects on the significance of Lord Neuberger’s analysis of judging in human rights cases