header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7643

06 March 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

R (on the application of Letts) v Lord Chancellor (Equality & Human Rights Commission intervening) [2015] EWHC 402 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 230 (Feb)

Davies (By her mother and litigation friend Zelda Davies) v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police (Just for Kids Law and another intervening) [2015] EWCA Civ 114, [2015] All ER (D) 221 (Feb)

Kassiopi Maritime Co Ltd v Fal Shipping Co Ltd [2015] EWHC 318 (Comm), [2015] All ER (D) 226 (Feb)

In their third update, Richard Marshall, Nicole Finlayson & Clare Arthurs discuss how to run a successful s 69 appeal

Jon Robins reviews the events of the jamboree that was the Global Law Summit

Ministry of Justice survey highlights opposition to rise in court fees

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll