header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7727

16 December 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

Worrall v Antoniadou [2016] EWCA Civ 1219, [2016] All ER (D) 30 (Dec)

Dominic Zammit provides a guide to how to successfully brand a merger

Charles Pigott reports on an airline’s refusal to accommodate breastfeeding cabin crew being discriminatory

Can Lord Bach produce a viable blueprint for a fair system of justice, asks Geoffrey Bindman QC

Jonathon Bray discusses ABS authorisation pain points

Bank of Baroda, GCC Operations and others v Nawany Marine Shipping FZE and others [2016] EWHC 3089 (Comm), [2016] All ER (D) 28 (Dec)

Groupe Go Sport v European Union Intellectual Property Office T-703/15 , [2016] All ER (D) 32 (Dec)

DHL Express (Austria) GmbH v Post-Control-Kommission and another C-2/15 , [2016] All ER (D) 34 (Dec)

Peter Thompson QC contends that setting aside a default judgment should be a free service

After Brexit: is international commercial litigation in London doomed? Pippa Rogerson examines the evidence

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll