header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7263

08 March 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Employers' liability for occupational stress, Interpretation of the Uninsured Drivers' Agreement 1999, Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act 1980

Employers' liability for occupational stress, Interpretation of the Uninsured Drivers' Agreement 1999, Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act 1980

Tenancy deposits scheme - landlords beware, The Court of Appeal reports, Danger in the TCC, Payments in - the end

R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWHC 243 (Admin), [2007] All ER (D) 278 (Feb)

R (on the application of Paul and others) v Deputy Coroner of the Queen's household and Assistant Deputy Coroner for Surrey, Reader and Others, v Molesworths Bright Clegg solicitors (a firm)

The insider reveals her fantasies about lawyers on reality TV

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll