header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7363

02 April 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

Tribunals should not stray beyond their core remit. Chris Bryden & Michael Salter explain why

Part 1: Mr Justice Briggs on the search for a proportionate way of ensuring confidentiality in mediation

Disagreements over the regulation and discipline of the profession will not be resolved overnight, says Des Hudson

Survey indicates a distinct lack of trust in the legal profession

Continuing, professional, developmental...Jane Ching debates the true meaning of CPD

Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report

Does Google’s “Streetview” compromise stretch the boundaries of privacy? John Cooper reports

More thoughts about “Zander on Woolf” by Tony Allen

The international enforcement of UK anti-corruption laws is on the rise, say Chris Warren-Smith, Jehan-Philippe Wood & Ian Pegram

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll