Peter Vaines examines the Pre-Budget Report, including elements that were conspicuous by their absence
Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech
Peter Vaines on Liechtenstein:the centre of the (tax) universe
Peter Vaines foresees that putting a foot wrong could land taxpayers in trouble
Peter Vaines pays a visit to Hotel California
Peter Vaines reports on life, tax & quantitative pleasing
A post-Budget lament by Peter Vaines
Peter Vaines tackles residency, domicile and Polish plumbers' suits
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson
Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating
Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor
West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire
JMW—Belinda Brooke
Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire
The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ
