header-logo header-logo

b2

Robert Hargreaves

Lecturer
Robert Hargreaves, lecturer in law, York St John University, Lord Mayor’s Walk, York. Newlawjournal.co.uk
Lecturer
Robert Hargreaves, lecturer in law, York St John University, Lord Mayor’s Walk, York. Newlawjournal.co.uk
ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Robert Hargreaves explains how the Crime & Policing Act rewrites corporate criminal liability

Was the promise actually delivered? Robert Hargreaves & Lily Johnston explain why employers must act now

New reforms go some way towards filling employment law’s long-acknowledged statutory gap, writes Robert Hargreaves

As part of an occasional series on the practical impact of recent landmark judgments, Robert Hargreaves reflects on Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton
Robert Hargreaves & Lily Johnston report on the demise of the two-year rule & what this means for employers & advisers
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll