header-logo header-logo

Constitutional law

Subscribe

R v ZAFAR AND OTHERS, R v K

Regulation

LEGAL AID CHANGES, CASE MANAGEMENT A SET BACK? SINS OF PARENTS REPORTED TO CHILDREN, ROAD TRAFFIC CASES UPDATE

Roger Smith muses on the conflict between divine and secular law.

George Wimpey UK Ltd v Tewkesbury Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 12, [2008] All ER (D) 177 (Jan)

Adrian Berry and Hina Majid unravel the UK Borders Act

Is blasphemous libel a dead letter? Neil Parpworth investigates

The law on suicide is out of kilter with modern society, says Richard Scorer

…and the cloud cuckoo land of legal nit-picking, by Geoffrey Bindman
 

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll