header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Employment

Subscribe
End of the line for temps? Premium Content

What are the implications of the recent Court of Appeal ruling on the status of agency workers? Michael Wynn investigates

06 March 2009 / Michael Wynn
You may have to be mad to work here Premium Content

Rob McCreath on the fallout from a high–octane workplace

05 March 2009 / Rob Mccreath
Air traffic age ban fails to fly

Landmark case outlaws “irrational” over 35 age limit

05 March 2009
Employment: Against the clock Premium Content

Has Matuszowicz reset the clock for employers dealing with DDA 1995 claims? Tom Poole reports

05 March 2009 / Tom Poole
A sigh of relief Premium Content

Part one: Andrew Burns unravels the strands of the asbestos “trigger” trial

27 February 2009 / Andrew Burns KC
Law in 101 words

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

27 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Employment law Premium Content

(Case C-350/06); Stringer v HM Revenue and Customs (Case C-520/06) [2009] All ER

27 February 2009
Discrimination Premium Content

Wilson v Health and Safety Executive [2009] All ER (D) 91 (Jan)

27 February 2009
Discrimination Premium Content

Ladele v London Borough of Islington [2009] All ER (D) 100 (Jan)

27 February 2009
Law in 101 words Premium Content

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

26 February 2009 / Roderick Ramage
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: How sure is ‘sure’ enough?
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
NLJ this week: A deferred prosecution reprieve
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
NLJ this week: Mandelson, Epstein & the court of popular opinion
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
NLJ this week: Volunteers, promotions & perilous appeals
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
NLJ this week: When saying no to mediation pays
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll