header-logo header-logo

Are Kate & William out of step with the majority of today’s couples? Charlotte Posnansky reports

Camilla Lovell-Hoare examines the complexities of surrogacy

Edward Heaton courts the question: when is a marriage a marriage?

Heather Platt examines the law in relation to children who sue their parents

Jonathan Herring examines the courts’ approach to conflict in two children custody cases

In his fifth FPR update, David Burrows looks at rules on evidence & disclosure

Christopher Stirling reports on setting aside dispositions to third parties in matrimonial proceedings

David Burrows examines costs & appeals under the Family Procedure Rules 2010

How can a divorcing couple’s reasonable needs be informed
by pre-marital property? Catherine Costley investigates

In his third FPR update David Burrows looks at costs savings, case management & mediation

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
back-to-top-scroll