header-logo header-logo

Procedure & practice

Subscribe

Julia Messervy-Whiting & Sofia Lobosco outline the importance of compliance with court orders, directions and CPR

    New possession ground; agent loses £42K commission; suspended by taxman; & a casual mistake

    Will the English courts still be top choice post-Brexit, asks Jonathan Harris QC

    Defamatory guts; blame the accountant; & wretched costs

    The government must act soon to protect London as a litigation hub, says Ed Crosse

    Steven Davies heralds the introduction of the electronic bill of costs

    Fee remission less painful; divorce competitions & civil appeal form changes

    Richard Harrison looks at modern ways of storing and accessing client information

    Pension relief for bankrupts; Suspended order shock; Family non-disclosure; Insolvency Rules found

    Latest CPR update; patently boring; MIAM change.

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Freeths—Ruth Clare

    Freeths—Ruth Clare

    National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

    Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

    Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

    Partner appointed head of family team

    mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

    mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

    Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

    NEWS
    Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
    The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
    Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
    The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
    A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
    back-to-top-scroll