header-logo header-logo

Training & education

Subscribe

Vanessa Davies explains why the new CPD scheme for established barristers is changing this year

Julie Brannan explains the SRA’s new approach to continuing competence

Paul Maharg explores the potential for AI & legal education

Solicitors are strongly committed to continuing training, says Stephen Honey

Paul Philip explains CPD for a modern profession

The legal profession needs to develop greater awareness of disability issues in order for wheelchair access to be improved, says Raquel Siganporia

Stephen Honey heralds the rise of the webinar

Ranse Howell & Andy Rogers discuss the dark art of negotiation

Opening up or shutting out? Funke Abimbola turns the spotlight on the legal profession

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll